Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBell, Raymond J.
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-01T15:19:25Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:19:25Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/391
dc.description.abstractRaymond Bell’s essay provides a detailed historical and theological account of the “Kokomo Justification Controversy” within the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS). The dispute centered on the doctrine of objective justification—the teaching that God, through Christ’s resurrection, declared the entire world forgiven of sin. Bell outlines the theological basis for objective justification, its distinction from subjective justification, and its historical roots in Lutheran confessions and writings. The controversy erupted at Faith Lutheran Church in Kokomo, Indiana, when two families (the Hartmans and Pohlmans) publicly rejected four statements summarizing WELS’s teaching on objective justification. Their opposition led to congregational discipline, appeals through WELS leadership, and eventually their removal from fellowship. Bell documents the theological arguments, procedural events, and broader synodical responses, including the role of Prof. J.P. Meyer’s commentary and the involvement of a Southeastern Wisconsin District Panel of Review. The essay concludes by affirming the comfort and necessity of objective justification as a Scriptural doctrine and recounts the lasting impact of the Kokomo case on WELS. —Generated by Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4)
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectChurch Disciplineen_US
dc.subjectFaith Evangelical Lutheran Church (Kokomo, IN)en_US
dc.subjectObjective Justificationen_US
dc.subjectKokomo Controversyen_US
dc.titleA Brief History of the Kokomo Fouren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record