| dc.description.abstract | In this essay, Dr. Siegbert W. Becker addresses concerns about variant readings in biblical manuscripts and their impact on the doctrine of verbal inspiration. He argues that while textual variants exist, they do not undermine the reliability, inerrancy, or divine authority of Scripture. Becker explains that verbal inspiration pertains to the meaning conveyed by the words, not rigid uniformity in vocabulary or grammar. He emphasizes that most variants are minor, stylistic, or synonymous, and do not affect doctrine. Even in rare cases where variants appear doctrinally problematic, manuscript evidence and broader biblical context affirm orthodoxy. Becker critiques both alarmist reactions and dismissive attitudes, urging honest engagement with textual criticism. He concludes that conservative Lutheranism has nothing to fear from variant readings, and that faith in Scripture’s truth remains secure despite textual differences.
Abstract generated by Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4) | |
