| dc.description.abstract | Siegbert W. Becker critically examines the historical-critical method of biblical interpretation, arguing that it undermines the authority, inerrancy, and divine inspiration of Scripture. He contrasts this method with the historical-grammatical approach, which treats the Bible as the verbally inspired Word of God. Becker outlines the origins and development of source, form, and redaction criticism, highlighting their reliance on human judgment over divine revelation. He warns that these methods lead to doctrinal decay, including the denial of miracles, prophecy, and key tenets of Christian faith. Becker contends that the historical-critical method places scholars above Scripture, eroding confidence in biblical truth and promoting theological relativism. He concludes that this approach is incompatible with Lutheran confessional theology and calls for vigilance against its influence in the church.
Abstract prepared by Microsoft Copilot (GPT-4). | |
